home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac of the 20th Century
/
TIME, Almanac of the 20th Century.ISO
/
1990
/
92
/
jan_mar
/
0106997.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-02-27
|
5KB
|
99 lines
<text>
<title>
(Jan. 06, 1992) The Coup Plotters
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Jan. 06, 1992 Man of the Year:Ted Turner
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
MAN OF THE YEAR, Page 40
BUNGLERS OF THE YEAR
The Coup Plotters.
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By George J. Church
</p>
<p> One died by his own hand, or was made to look as though he
had. Thirteen more are in prison, most in Remand Center No. 4
in the Moscow suburbs, which has been cleared of common
criminals to house only the elite of the Russian underworld--and the accused plotters of last August's coup. There they await
trial on charges of high treason. If found guilty--and several
insist they were innocent dupes--they could be imprisoned for
10 to 15 years, or put to death. But whatever their eventual
fate, one thing is totally clear: the plotters have no rivals
for the title of Bunglers of the Year. In fact, not just of the
year. If there were such a thing as an Incompetence Olympics
held every four years, the Moscow plotters would easily win the
gold medal and set a world record that might last as long as
Leapin' Bob Beamon's mark in the long jump.
</p>
<p> Not just because they failed either. Anyone can fail, even
fail abysmally. The special accomplishment of the Moscow
plotters was to speed the total destruction of everything they
wanted to preserve and ensure the triumph of the trends they
most hated and wanted to stop.
</p>
<p> They did fail, of course, and farcically, and because of
their own blunders. The collapse of the coup was inevitable only
because it was so badly planned and halfheartedly carried out:
had the plotters acted with half the acumen and ruthlessness of
the routine Latin general or African strongman seizing power,
they might have succeeded. But some appeared to be more
terrified than any of their prospective victims. Prime Minister
Valentin Pavlov and Vice President Gennadi Yanayev, the
ostensible head (really figurehead) of the so-called Emergency
Committee, reportedly spent most of the three days of the coup
dead drunk. Though Yanayev pulled himself together long enough
to hold a press conference the first night of the coup, he and
some other members of the committee looked scared out of their
wits.
</p>
<p> Some of the conspirators, notably Interior Minister Boris
Pugo (the apparent suicide), Defense Minister Dmitri Yazov and
KGB chief Vladimir Kryuchkov, are said to have begun plotting
in December 1990. If so, eight months later they still had not
organized the most obvious, and essential, opening moves:
arresting, or preferably killing, potential opponents (some
supporters of Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev operated
unmolested from a Kremlin office almost next door to Yanayev's);
assuring themselves of the loyalty of military units and then
moving them into position to crush resistance speedily (army and
KGB units flatly refused to storm the White House, the
marble-faced Moscow headquarters of the Russian republic and the
center of resistance); and cutting the communications of
resistance leaders (George Bush was openly surprised at how easy
it was for him to put through a phone call to Russian President
Boris Yeltsin). Some of the ringleaders apparently did not even
make sure of the cohesion of their own group; they duped others
into joining the coup by telling an easily disproved lie, that
an ill Gorbachev had authorized them to take over.
</p>
<p> No one can say, of course, exactly what would have
happened had they never tried their putsch. But quite likely
their continued presence in the government would have forced
repeated compromises that would have kept a brake on reform and
democratization of Soviet society. The new treaty of union the
putschists acted to forestall would have been signed and kept
at least some of the bigger republics in a union with a weakened
but functioning central government. The Communist Party, though
declining, might have retained considerable influence.
</p>
<p> Instead revulsion against the coup resulted in the
downfall of the party and an accelerated move toward complete
independence on the part of the Soviet republics. That move has
now killed the union completely, forced the resignation of
Gorbachev, and has given birth to a Commonwealth of Independent
States that is more of an alliance than a nation. To fail so
totally as to bring about the exact opposite of what you want--that calls for more than run-of-the-mill incompetence. It
requires a kind of perverse genius that will make the Moscow
plotters memorable long after the state they betrayed has faded
into history.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>